Conference on Wednesday the Supreme Court welcomed decision To put on Sedition law contract.
New Delhi:
With the continuation of the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party and the opposition Congress trade Barbs over Historic Supreme Court order on Sedition law in the colonial era, senior Congress Party Leader P Chidambaram on Thursday criticized Law Minister Keren Rego over His remark is Lakshman Rakha. After placing the Supreme Court on Application contract of The controversial Sedition Act, Mr. Reju said while he “respects the court and its independence”, there is a “Lakshman Rekha” that cannot be bypassed.
Mr. Chidambaram, in response to the remark, said that the Minister of Law had no authority to draw any arbitrary “Lakshman Rekha” and should Read Article 13 of Constitution which allows for Any law prior to the constitution shall be announced void If it is inconsistent with Constitutional rights.
“The legislature cannot make a law, and a law cannot allow it to do so.” remain on A book of legislation that violates basic rights. Sedition law in The view of Many legal scholars violate Articles 19 and 21 of the Constitution ” former Union Minister said on Twitter.
Minister of Law of India has no authority to draw any arbitrary Lakshman Rekha
he is should Read Article 13 of the Constitution
The legislature may not pass a law, and a law may not allow it remain on Legislation that violates fundamental rights
– P. Chidambaram (@PChidambaram_IN) 12 May 2022
“All the king’s horses and all the king’s men “This law cannot be kept,” said Mr. Chidambaram. in Swipe in the center.
Then Mr. Rijiju hit back On the conference leader, pointing out that first The constitution has been amended in by first Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru. sought to limit fundamental rights to protection against abuse of Freedom of Speech and expression.
“That’s why I brought Nehru ji in First Amendment and Smt Indira Gandhi made Article 124a Recognized Offense for The first the time in India history?
During the Anna movement and other anti-corruption movements, citizens were subjected to harassment, intimidation and arrests? on Twitter.
That’s why I brought Nehru Ji in First Amendment and Smt Indira Gandhi made Article 124a Recognized Offense for The first the time in India history?
During the Anna movement and other anti-corruption movements, citizens were subjected to harassment, intimidation and arrests? https://t.co/ZJsIfLuzme
– Kiren Rijiju (KirenRijiju) 12 May 2022
“we’ve got made Our attitudes are very clear And also Report the intent to the court of Our Prime Minister (Prime Minister Narendra Modi). We respect the court and its independence. But there is “Rekha Lakshman” which must be respected by all the members of the state in Text and spirit. We should we should ensure We respect the rulings of The Minister of Law told reporters about the court order yesterday.
“We respect each other, court should respect governmentthe legislature, and that government should also Respect the court. have clear demarcation of And that Lakshman Rakha should It cannot be overtaken by anyone,” Mister Rigo added.
As is made sharp commentMr. Rijiju has dodged a question on Whether the Supreme Court thought decision It was wrong.
Conference on Wednesday the Supreme Court welcomed decision To put on Holding the law of strife saying a clear The broken message has gone to the subordinates of Opposing that “you can no longer suppress voice of truth”And that critical of The government must be heard.
The Minister of Law was yesterday in a series of She described the Congressional tweets as “the opposite.” of Freedom, democracy and respect for Institutions ‘after former Congress President and Representative Wayanad Rahul Gandhi took Fun in the center over “crush truth”.
Blank words by Tweet embed
if there was one party This is the opposite of Freedom, democracy and respect for Institutions, it is the Indian National Congress.
This party has always stopped with smash India’s forces and left There is no chance of partitioning India. https://t.co/Rajl1pG2v8
– Kiren Rijiju (KirenRijiju) May 11, 2022
The controversial sedition law will be suspended within a period of time government The court said today and allows these prisoners to review it for Sedition on approaching the courts for surety. center argued against Residence on Law, arguing that it would be review That and a police officer of the level of Supervisor or above can decide whether the charge of sedition should say goodibye to in In the meantime.
.
