LAHORE:
Lahore High Court division bench, chaired by Justice Shujaat Ali Khan, upheld the LHC head of justice in a decree that allowed Punjab Assembly Deputy Speaker Sardar Dost Muhammad Mazari to lead session for elections of scheduled meeting of the chief minister on 16 April.
This is second the time when PA speaker Chaudhry Pervez Elahi and the secretariat lost their legal battle against deputy speaker.
Earlier, LHC Chief Justice Muhammad Amir Bhatti ordered Mazari to proceed with the election CM in terms of subclause (3) of Article 130 of Constitution. This order was issued on Mazar’s petition against Speaker of Elahi who according to him, withdrew his powers as acting speaker.
As LHC Chief Justice Muhammad Amir Bhatti set towards the order by which powers of the deputy speaker was recalled, the speaker of Elahi and the PA secretariat appealed the verdict.
LHC this time division bench led by Judge Shujaat Ali Khan and composed of Judge Javad Hasan heard the case in detail.
Friday, when the trial began, division benchx head Judge Shujaat was in charge of the Inspector General of Police (IGP) Punjab, who attended in courtroom to review the SOP and ensure complete security on election day and no members of the assembly is prohibited from entering the premises of the assembly.
Meanwhile Judge Shujaat also sent the chief of the Punjab secretary coordinate with IGP and ensure smooth process on election Day.
See also: Bazdar and Chima are discussing CM elections
Arguments of adviсe of Elahi and the PA secretariat revolved around “bias”.
At the beginning of arguments, Mazari reported bench that his powers of the deputy speaker was recalled and the meeting was made “don’t go area”. He told the court that he had never witnessed such practice even under a dictatorship.
He said he sent a notice of April 6 instead of April 16 following a statement from the Punjab Attorney General (AGP). in Supreme Court.
In this moment bench Ahmad Awais asked the AGP. who denied any statement made before the Sun. He begged the court to just described the actual situation in the Supreme Court and did not give any obligations that the elections would be held on April 6th.
benchx second Member Judge Javad Hasan reads paragraph (3) of Article 53 of The constitution stated that the case revolved around a line “incapable of perform its functions due to any cause”. Judge Jawad asked PML-Q’s lawyers what “cause they attribute with speaker.
They claimed that cause that the Speaker of Elahi disputes the CMquestion. In response to another question from Judge Javad that “cause you attribute with deputy speaker Mazari, they said he became moot.
They are added that rules very clear for that man who losing it confidence among the majority of its members. They said that eventually the House would preside over from the main person in the group of chairmen that announced speaking on first is sitting of in session.
Barrister Ali Zafar presented four points which, according to him, cause a mixed reaction from the vice-speaker Mazari. First, a motion of no confidence was filed. against his, secondly, Mazar became party in trial because he was bringing charges against the candidate speaker of Elahi. Thirdly, PML-N lawyers argue that in support of Mazari is here and fourth, Mazari has expressed his opinion on TV shows.
Read also: LHC summons vice speaker
At the request of Judge Javad regarding how can the court judge the bias of a person and what is the criterion for it, PA counsel argued that bias does not mean the person is biased, adding that bias entails when others start tilt feeling of someone in particular side. He also expressed concern that Deputy Speaker Mazari might give benefit to others in in the CM contest.
Advice from Deputy Speaker Mazari asked if there was any point in the opposite side lawyers claim that Mazari became party in law battle although he just knocked on the door of court for receiving justice. He argued that paragraph (3) of Article 53 of The constitution is very clear neither his client is missing, nor can he perform neither its function nor any cause opposite side It was developed after which it can be concluded drawn that the Vice Speaker could not chair the meeting session.
.
