– Calls for review of Supreme Court Verdict on Punjab Polls full court
ISLAMABAD: National Assembly on Thursday in the resolution rejected the decision of the higher court decision on elections in Punjab and called prime minister and the Federal Cabinet did not comply with it.
The house is called for V review of V decision through full court and expressed its reservations about the “misinterpretation of Article 63-A of Constitution, as well as its rewriting by decision of Supreme Court”.
The resolution introduced by the leader of the parliament of Balochistani Awami Party Khalid Mugsi and Adopted, states: “This House rejects the minority decision of trinomial bench and binds prime minister and the cabinet not to exercise unconstitutional and illegal decision”.
“What in resolution adopted by the House of Honor on March 28, 2023 supporting majority decision of four judges of Supreme Court in Case Suo Motu No. 1/2023 from the Supreme Court demanded its execution and avoid improper interference in political and administrative affairs. Majority of circles also demanded education of A full court, but it was not approved, and the point of view of other political parties other than one was not heard,” the text says. of permission available with Pakistan today.
“Ignoring this clear permission of parliament and majority decision of four judges of Supreme Court, composed of three members special bench imposed by the minority opinion, which also violation of own traditions, precedents and procedures of the Supreme Court.
“Parliament rejects decision of a minority of three bench and announces decision of majority bench carried out in accordance with the constitution and the law.”
“This meeting supports decision of trinomial bench of the Supreme Court is not set cases brought under section 184 (3) of Constitution of Pakistan for their hearing before decisions on V full court hearing and his views with deep concern move terminate its implementation by an executive circular.”
“This house also expresses serious concern over hasty establishment of the same judicial decision for hearing before another controversial bench and fast decision on This in A couple of minutes. House terms this step clearly against traditions and precedents of Supreme Court and declares it inadmissible.”
The house expresses its concern over improper judicial interference in political affairs. Recent minority decision creating political instability in country and paving way for division into federal units. Therefore, this House considers the holding of general elections simultaneously throughout the country in the manner prescribed down in The constitution and the law are crucial for political and economic stability in country and terms it’s like a solution for everyone problems”.
“This House rejects the minority decision of trinomial bench and obliges the prime minister and the cabinet not to follow it is unconstitutional and illegal decision”.
“The house expresses serious concern over misinterpretation of Article 63-A of Constitution, as well as its rewriting by decision of Supreme Court and requires review on it’s by full court.”
