WASHINGTON (AP) – Republican Leader Kevin McCarthy does it clear that he will likely waive a subpoena from the House committee investigating the case on January 6, 2021 at the Capitol. attackaggravation of confrontation with in panel over testimony from him and other GOP legislators.
In an 11-page letter to panel Friday, lawyer for McCarthy argued that the select committee had no authority issue subpoenas to lawmakers in the House of Representatives rules and demanded a response series of questions and documents if his client had to comply.
Attorney Elliot Burke requested list of “topics that the Special Committee would like to like discuss with Leader, and the constitutional and legal rationale for the request.”
“I expressly reserve for Leader McCarthy to assert any other applicable privilege or objection to the Select Committee’s subpoena,” Burke wrote.
House panel believes that the testimony of Republican legislators is crucial to their investigation, since each of in men was in contact with then President Donald Trump and his allies in weeks and days leading up to rebellion on the Capitol. Some participated in meetings and urged the White House to try to overthrow the 2020 presidential election. results.
McCarthy admitted that he said with Trump on January 6, when Trump supporters beat the police. outside Capitol and forcing them way in building. But he didn’t share many details. The Committee requested information about his conversations with Trump “before, during and after” the riots.
His apparent defiance is new challenge for committee after lawmakers decided to take an extraordinary and politically risky step of subpoenaing his colleagues.
“For the Republican leaders in the House of Representatives to agree to participate in this political stunt will change the House of Representatives forever,” the California MP wrote on Thursday. in article in Wall Street Magazine with Republican Party Representative Jim Jordan of Ohio.
The committee must now decide whether the subpoenas should be enforced, even if they appear to be completed. up investigation and prepare for a series of public hearings in the beginning of June. He can send legislators to the House Ethics Committee or pass steps keep them in contempt.
Subpoenas were sent to McCarthy, Jordan, and representatives Scott Perry. of Pennsylvania, Andy Biggs of Arizona and Moe Brooks of Alabama in mid May. panel It has already interview more more than 1000 witnesses and gathered more over 100,000 documents, investigating the worst attack on Capitol in two centuries.
“I don’t have the right information it will advance any legitimate legislative goal,” Jordan said. in a letter detailing his reasons for does not cooperate. The rest indicated after the subpoenas were sent to the court that they too would not cooperate.
Earlier this week, Perry’s attorney sent a letter to the committee saying he “cannot in good conscience obeys with subpoena because he does not believe it is valid under the House rules.
Requests for comment from Biggs and Brooks did not immediately return.
panel previously asked for the voluntary cooperation of the five legislators, and with A handful of other members of the Republican Party, but all refused to speak with in panel which discussed for months issue subpoenas.
McCarthy and others were called to testify. in front of investigators this week and next a week. mccarthy, who seeks to become Speaker of the House of Representatives if Republicans pass over majority next year indicated that the committee decision will have a lasting effect.
“Each representative in the minority would be subjected to forced interrogation by the majority under oath, without any foundation of justice and through of taxpayers,” he wrote. in ed.
In a separate move, McCarthy and Republican No. 2 in the House of Representatives, Louisiana Rep. Steve Scalise, filed a subpoena in support of Donald Trump ally Steve Bannon who is facing criminal allegations of disrespect for contrary to the agenda of the committee. Briefly, lawyers for two write that the committee has no authority issue subpoenas, an argument that was rejected in other litigation.
Lawyers also wrote that McCarthy and Scalise filed a brief “out of anxiety for potential damage to the establishment of the House” rules and order.
.
