during social media Surveillance, Intelligence Integration and Strategic Operations Unit of The special The cell noticed that many Twitter accounts, Facebook files, TV discussions, etc. social media handles have been posted material He allegedly spreads hate and against The “maintenance of public Calm and serenity.”
One of those tweets was posted By Naveen Kumar Jindal From his handle “naveenjindalbjp” which used the words and language against prophet Mohammed. These words Jindal used were extremely provocative and more Enough to incite feelings of between hate people Which can be harmful maintenance of public Quiet (sic),” reads the flight information provided by the police.
Recently, there has been widespread circulation of the words, language used by Jindal in The above tweet on social media (sic). The tweet was analyzed and it turned out that he used certain words for Prophet Muhammad who was not cloned (in the FIR) to consider sensitivity of The issue”,” fir adds.
From the analysis of material available on social media And the articles published in newspapers and other forums, it clearly depicts that some other people were also using Languages worth hating (sic) intentionally or owning complete Find out use of Like language not only assertive claim discriminatory but more Enough to create a situation of hostility between different groups of Faithful people in different religions.” The Islamic Information Report then mentions the following: Shaddad Chauhan, Saba Naqvi, Hafiz Al Hassan Ansari, Bihari Lal Yadav, Elias Sarfuddin, Maulana Mufti Nadim, Abdul Rahman, R Vikraman, Najma Sheikh, Dr. Muhammad Kaleem Turk, Atyur Rahman Khan, Suja Ahmed, Vineta Sharma, Imtiaz Ahmed, Asaduddin Owaisi, Kumar Devashankar, Danesh Qureshi, Muhammad Sajid Shaheen, Keo Sensi, Gulzar Ansari, Saifuddin Qutouz, Maulana Sarfraz, Pooja Shakun Pandey, Pooja Priamvada, Meenakizi, Pooja Priamvada.
“This would certainly be a serious threat to public calm and maintenance of public ranking in Our country is in it people They were living in peace. Send and publish of Such as language Done through electronic media She is dirty in nature He appeals to the rational and sufficient interest to corrupt and corrupt any human being who Watch it or hear the disapproving words (sic),” the FIR claims as well.
The language The uploaded photo is not mentioned taking into account nature of the case. Discuss the topic on Twitter incites emotions that can create issue of maintenance of Hello. As cyberspace is limitless, the implications of this have a wide-ranging effect various slash of Country. Jindal et al used the provocative language without using Any precautions and knowledge will have wide repercussions,” as the FIR reads content of Alleged tweets, a prima facie offense under Sections 153, 153a, 153b, 295a, 298, 504, 505 and 506 of IPC is made out said the police. The sections relate to the promotion of hostility between different groups and deliberate acts intended to provoke religious sentiments.
.
