New Delhi: Lok Sabha passed the Criminal Procedure (Identification) Act on Monday with home minister Amit Shah assured the House that “government You will do everything for ensure There is no abuse of Law “Where the opposition came mainly from on Possibilities” of Law enforcement authorities harass citizens and misuse data, leading to penetrate of individual privacy.
after demand from all sides home minister He emphasized that the bill would “certainly be sent to the Standing Committee”. at reply Before the bill is passed by a voice voteShah said the bill would ensure that investigators remain two steps Before of criminals. He said those who raise human rights concerns should do so also show they for Rights of Victims of crime.
Almost the entire opposition, including the BJD party led by Navin Patnaik, opposed the Criminal Procedure (Identification) Act 2022, in lok sabha on Monday, basically over afraid of Misuse of the law against individual citizens by police forces and other law enforcement agencies, on Data collection without any law for data protection after in country and also in terms of “Violation” of fundamental rights guaranteed by the Constitution on After the bill passed.
The bill has been passed on Monday evening by a voice voteEven when the entire opposition has demanded that it be sent to the Permanent or Select Committee of Parliament for audit. YS Jaganmohan Reddy was led by the only YSRCP party in Opposition seats that supported the bill for pass but party MP Midoun Reddy demanded “stronger guarantees” from government to ensure The law will not be used to settle scores against Political competitors and data will not be misused.
During the discussion, members expressed concern over General provisions in Draft legislation that authorized a head Policeman of police station or a head guard of a jail to take “measurements” of The convicts, as well as those in preventive detention. asked RSP member NK Premachandran for edit on The lines but the house overturned.
At the start of the debate, Congressman Manish Tiwari said the bill was “cruel and dangerous against Civil liberties.” Since the bill provides for take measurements of Convicts and others for the stuff of identification and investigation in criminal Matters and keep records, it was against Spirit of Articles 14, 19 and 21 of Dealing with the constitution with He said human rights and civil liberties.
Dayanade Maran (DMK) said the bill was against-people And the against Spirit of federation. accuse the government of Trying to establish a control state by bringing in He said such legislation was “open and infringed.” on Privacy of singly.”
Transitional Military Council member Mahwa Muitra said the bill seeks to replace the ID card of The Prisoners Act of 1920, but the proposed law contained fewer guarantees than the law enacted by the British. in absentia of data protection Law, the proposed measure lacks guarantees ensure that information Collected was well protected, can lead for violation of Privacy of An individual who She said he was not convicted. Shiv Sena member Vinayak Raut described the bill as a “cruel joke on humanitySupriya Sule, an NCP member, argued that the bill violated of Article 21, the right to be forgotten, the right of prisoners.
after demand from all sides home minister He emphasized that the bill would “certainly be sent to the Standing Committee”. at reply Before the bill is passed by a voice voteShah said the bill would ensure that investigators remain two steps Before of criminals. He said those who raise human rights concerns should do so also show they for Rights of Victims of crime.
Almost the entire opposition, including the BJD party led by Navin Patnaik, opposed the Criminal Procedure (Identification) Act 2022, in lok sabha on Monday, basically over afraid of Misuse of the law against individual citizens by police forces and other law enforcement agencies, on Data collection without any law for data protection after in country and also in terms of “Violation” of fundamental rights guaranteed by the Constitution on After the bill passed.
The bill has been passed on Monday evening by a voice voteEven when the entire opposition has demanded that it be sent to the Permanent or Select Committee of Parliament for audit. YS Jaganmohan Reddy was led by the only YSRCP party in Opposition seats that supported the bill for pass but party MP Midoun Reddy demanded “stronger guarantees” from government to ensure The law will not be used to settle scores against Political competitors and data will not be misused.
During the discussion, members expressed concern over General provisions in Draft legislation that authorized a head Policeman of police station or a head guard of a jail to take “measurements” of The convicts, as well as those in preventive detention. asked RSP member NK Premachandran for edit on The lines but the house overturned.
At the start of the debate, Congressman Manish Tiwari said the bill was “cruel and dangerous against Civil liberties.” Since the bill provides for take measurements of Convicts and others for the stuff of identification and investigation in criminal Matters and keep records, it was against Spirit of Articles 14, 19 and 21 of Dealing with the constitution with He said human rights and civil liberties.
Dayanade Maran (DMK) said the bill was against-people And the against Spirit of federation. accuse the government of Trying to establish a control state by bringing in He said such legislation was “open and infringed.” on Privacy of singly.”
Transitional Military Council member Mahwa Muitra said the bill seeks to replace the ID card of The Prisoners Act of 1920, but the proposed law contained fewer guarantees than the law enacted by the British. in absentia of data protection Law, the proposed measure lacks guarantees ensure that information Collected was well protected, can lead for violation of Privacy of An individual who She said he was not convicted. Shiv Sena member Vinayak Raut described the bill as a “cruel joke on humanitySupriya Sule, an NCP member, argued that the bill violated of Article 21, the right to be forgotten, the right of prisoners.
.
