ISLAMABAD:
We need strong opposition for any democracy, especially for functional parliament.
However, in absence of big chunk of legislators PTI, who recently resigned general debate on in budget what started on Monday in The National Assembly is expected to be merely a symbolic event, as the majority of legislators are sitting on opposition benches who helped the current government come to power.
While the dissident lawmakers of the Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) in National Assembly officially joined any other party neither voted against former prime minister Imran Khan when he faced in no-confidence movement, it was evident from their behavior in recent past that they provided much-needed leverage to the then opposition parties to roll back the previous government coalition partners far and successfully execute a move against Imran.
Although the Supreme Court has not ruled that votes of dissidents will not be counted before Imran is expelled from office, PTI’s dissident legislators were smart enough to maintain a secure distance just to avoid any legal consequences later on.
They succeeded and now they enjoy the powers of desired offices of leader of opposition in National Assembly and Accounts Committee – accountability Forum of parliament, among other things.
because of then different shades of in budget session conspicuously absent from meetings of the National Assembly on Friday when the federal government introduced budget for in next fiscal year.
coalition government rolled up out his focus on elections budget among the rare silence and unprecedented scenes of calmness in Lower house of parliament – otherwise chaotic place of quarrel and quarrel noise during past budget presentations.
Similarly, according to political scientists, the least expected were informed and meaningful debates, especially with lame opposition in in current system, while budget never referred to any committee for examination.
“Ideally, the opposition should not only to be present, but also to critically consider and point out out weak sides in in budget” said Ahmed Bilal Mehboob, President of Pakistan Institute of Legislative Development and Transparency (PILDAT).
“Even with opposition in a large number, they do not deal in informed debate; they just raise populist slogans like petrol bomb. They rarely speak of policy alternatives.”
pointing out reasons, the president of PILDAT said that “one reason for this is our parliament budget the process that just 10 to 12 days and is never submitted to committees where real check takes place”.
“When there is opposition, I don’t expect much. improvement in quality of debate,” Mehboob said, “there may have been more hooliganism and even brawls—which was clearly lacking in the budget introductory session. The opposition’s empty benches provided the same momentum on Monday when the leader of opposition Raja Riaz opened the debate on budget session.
However, Mehboob clarified that he did not talk about the lack of opposition. “I’m only saying that no significant improvement in budget debate is to be expected because members are not usually work hard prepare for real examination of budget”.
He recalled that a small ineffective opposition was noticed in National Assembly in 1997-1999 But efficiency does not necessarily depend on amount; I can remember the 1965-1970 West Pakistan Provincial Assembly, which had only a few opposition members,” Mehboob said, adding, “Only three members — Khawaja Safdar, M. Hamza and Malik Akhtar — were so well prepared and eloquent that acted as a very effective opposition”.
“In the 1985 National Assembly,” he continued, “Haji Saifulla became onemember of the opposition, because of his grip of parliamentary rules procedures and activism.
Saving the budgetintroductory session in viewwhen the opposition benches got busy with devouring budget books thrown away on their tables just before finances minister started reading it budget speeches, political experts believe that serious input from lawmakers will be absent as a vague and submissive presence of the ruling alliance and members of the opposition turned out to be just a staged formality.
Monday session the same is shown. The opposition leader’s speech touched on various areas, out a few shortcomings, but he blamed the previous solution party, of of which he is still a member and leading in house as leader of the opposition for in current a crisis.
GDA’s Gus Bux Mahar rightly questioned how would be effective role of leader of the opposition when he already showed it intentions what will he dispute next elections from ticket of in current resolution party – Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz (PML-N).
political analyst Zaigam Khan, commenting on in budget presentation against the backdrop of empty opposition benches, said that the lack of of serious contribution of public representatives in in budget the process was more serious issue how total amount of legislators.
Everything for Zaygam parliament remains missing during budget process because, unlike developed democracies, budget the cycle is not properly followed and parliamentary committees are not preparing a proposal or review budgeting of relevant departments and sectors.
“Budget documents are being dropped in front of parliamentarians on in budget day, and they do not have enough time to review them,” Zaigam said, adding: “It can be said that the absence of opposition is only symbolic, and the presence of parliamentarians of ruling alliance also symbolic”.
.
