There is no intent to misuse judgments of CPC (Determining), which is supposed to ensure That the police and the two investigators steps Before of Criminals, Home Minister Amit Shah told the Lok Sabha, who passed the bill on Monday.
Reply to discussion on The draft law that the opposition demanded be sent to the Permanent Committee for Further scrutiny, Shah said it was a matter of protecting “human rights of Victims of crimes, not just criminals.”
“We have no intention of of Misuse of judgments of Shah said. “We are supposed to keep our police at the front of criminals. The crimes of the next generation cannot be addressed with Old techniques we should try to take criminal justice system to me next era.”
Seeking to allay opposition fears possible Misuse of Shah said that the bill rules and procedure of Judgments will be framed at a later time for States. “better technology It will be used for Data protection and there will be training of He said.
Earlier, shared in discussion on Opposition MPs described the bill’s provisions as “extremely harsh” and demanded it be referred to a permanent parliamentary committee.
Provides bill for take measurements of Convicts and other persons for identification and investigation in criminal Matters, keep records.
Many members of the opposition raised concern over General provisions in The bill granting powers head Policeman of o . police station head guard of a jail to take “measurements” of Convicts and those in preventive detention.
It is called “strict and against Manish Tiwari of Congress said it is against Spirit of Articles 14, 19 and 21 of Constitution, dealing with Human rights and civil liberties. “it’s a also against The widely accepted saying that everyone should Treated innocent unless proven guilty. judgments of The bill is very broad and vague and could be abused by the state and the police.
Will pave the bill way for Tiwari said India would become a watchdog.
In response to the concern raised by Congress, Shah said there was no intention of mentally analyzing drugs through judgments. of Bill who speaks of Biometric data collection of criminals.
what’s up says
Provides bill for take measurements of Convicts and other persons for identification and investigation in criminal Matters, keep records.
Dianady Maran of DMK . charged government of Trying to establish a surveillance state. He said: It is open and contrary on aggregate of singly.”
TMC’s Mahwa Muitra said the bill seeks to replace the ID card of The Prisoners Act of 1920, but the proposed law contained fewer guarantees than the law enacted by the British.
in absence of data protection Muitra said the proposed measure lacked guarantees ensure that information Collected well protected, can lead for violation of Privacy of An individual who not convicted.
She said the bill seeks to group people Reservation for preventive detention with detainees for Serious crimes.
While MP Shiv Sena Vinayak Raut opposed the bill, calling it a “cruel joke on humanityHe said it infringes on basic rights of Individual and open to abuse.
Biju Janata member Dal Bhratruhari Mahtab said so on The face of It bill is a modern measure compared to its colonial predecessor but it is called for Stronger safeguards to prevent abuse. “This has the potential to create a comprehensive profile of He said.
Mahtab said it was going to happen easier to accept judgments of This law has data protection The law and the law of DNA profiling in place.
Sopriya Soli, an NCP member, alleged that the bill violated Article 21, the right to be forgotten, and the rights of of prisoners.
Referring to concerns raised by the opposition, Shah said that such provisions exist in countries Such as the United Kingdom, South Africa, etc., where rate of prosecution of Lots of criminals higher From in India. “Do not be afraid of Database … all world He is using database,” he said.
database was in use for two and-half years for solve Offenses, including automobile He said thefts.
.
