AMD launches Navi as the $449 Radeon RX 5700 XT

Launch with everything else on June 7–.

AMD claims performance-per-dollar leadership over Nvidia, however for how long?

Ron Amadeo


  • The Radeon RX 5700 XT. It has a funny dent in the top.

  • The prices.

  • Specs on the 5700 XT.


  • Specs on the non-XT version.


  • AMD likewise has an unique gold “50 th-anniversary edition” it will sell on for $499


  • The XT all pulled apart.


  • A shot of the GPU.


  • The brand-new RDNA architecture assures much better performance per watt and per clock, and it will appear in all manner of devices.


  • If you wish to think AMD’s standards, here’s a chart showing the RX 5700 XT versus what AMD considers to be its competitors, the RTX2070



  • The 5700 non-XT versus the RTX2060 Once again, await independent benchmarks.


  • AMD’s lots of design wins recently.

AMD took the phase at E3 to reveal its “Navi” family of GPUs. The business’s new graphics cards are formally the AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT and Radeon RX5700 The 5700 series is introducing July 7, making the GPUs a one-two punch together with AMD’s Ryzen 3000 series CPUs.

AMD isn’t taking on the flagship GPU market with the 5700 series. Instead, the company is going for more mainstream prices with mainstream efficiency: the 5700 XT is $449, while the 5700 is $379 AMD is placing the cards against Nvidia’s GeForce RTX 2070 ($499) and 2060 ($349), respectively, and claims performance wins in each comparison.

The cards present AMD’s new “RDNA” architecture, which AMD states has 1.25 x performance-per-clock and 1.5 x performance-per-watt over the previous generation. The chips are developed on TSMC’s 7nm production process, a substantial avoid the 12 nm procedure utilized on the Radeon RX 590, and on Nvidia’s GeForce RTX2080 The Navi die is considerably smaller sized than the previous-generation Vega style, with a die area of just 251 mm2compared to the 495 mm2die area for Vega. The smaller die needs to make the Navi substantially cheaper to produce than Vega.

For specifications, the top-end Radeon RX 5700 XT has 40 calculate units with 2560 stream processors total. AMD provides 3 numbers for the clock rate on the XT: a 1605 MHz “Base” clock, a 1755 MHz “Video game” clock, and a 1905 MHz “Increase” clock. As typical, the cheaper 5700 disables calculate systems and decreases the clock rate, so you have 36 calculate systems for 2304 stream processor overall, a base clock of 1465 MHz, game clock of 1625 MHz, and an increase clock of 1725 MHz.

If any of these clock rates are too conservative for you, AMD is guaranteeing the 5700 XT is “overclocking all set” thanks to a power option with room to grown. Both of AMD’s reference styles come with 8GB of GDDR6 memory.

An exploded view of the XT.

Enlarge/A blew up view of the XT.


For cooling, AMD’s recommendation style is a blower-style card with an aluminum shroud and back plate. A vapor chamber draws heat into the heatsink, and whatever gets burnt out the back of the card. Blower cooling styles have the downside of producing a great deal of noise, but AMD is assuring a “peaceful” card thanks to an “acoustically tuned” design. If you’re dissatisfied with the cooler design, partner-produced cards with alternative cooling options ought to be out eventually. The cards both take a 8-pin 6-pin power-supply connection, with AMD providing Board Power figures of 225 W for the XT and 180 W for the cheaper card.

If you get the entire AMD bundle in July (suggesting a Ryzen 3000 CPU, an X570 motherboard, and a Radeon 5700 card), you’ll be all up and running with the new PCI Express 4.0 bus standard. This quicker adjoin will be great for next-gen SSDs and 200 Gbps (!) Ethernet controllers. However for video cards, we have not seen a compelling use case yet. Still, it supplies space for upgrades!

All these specifications are nice to understand, but they do not truly tell us anything about actual performance. As always, it’s finest to wait for independent standards, and if you’re in the marketplace for a GPU, it’s probably also finest to see if Nvidia does anything in action.

And speaking of Nvidia’s reaction, the company has actually been teasing a “Super” GeForce product for a few weeks now. The reports indicate “Super” cards being up-clocked editions of Nvidia’s existing cards and price drops for some non-super cards, making the company more competitive with AMD’s freshly declared lineup. Once again though, benchmarks will tell the real story. AMD likewise doesn’t have an answer this generation for the real-time raytracing innovation that Nvidia presented with the RTX 2080 Ti. But given the huge hit in efficiency that ray tracing causes for even Nvidia’s fastest cards (and the limited game assistance for raytracing), it’s not a big loss for AMD.

No matter what occurs between AMD and Nvidia in the PC graphics card wars, AMD GPUs guarantee to be practically all over else in the future. At the beginning of the discussion, AMD talked about the business’s design wins, mentioning that AMD is supplying graphics chips to both the next-gen Xbox and Playstation consoles, Apple’s Mac Pro, and Google’s Stadia game-streaming platform. AMD likewise just recently inked an RDNA licensing offer with Samsung, which will construct the graphics innovation into its Exynos SoCs for mobile phones and tablets.


Leave a Reply