Facebook’s board of directors appears to be like to be sticking to the script in the defense of its opposition study into George Soros, a vocal critic of the platform. In a letter reported Wednesday by the Wall Avenue Journal from Facebook’s board of directors to Patrick Gaspard, the president of George Soros’ Open Society Foundations, the firm defended its Chief Working Officer Sheryl Sandberg and her seek info from for info on the billionaire philanthropist.
The letter adopted Gaspard’s beget letter to Facebook’s board members on Tuesday concerning Sandberg’s involvement with Facebook’s opposition advertising campaign in opposition to Soros and by which he questioned whether or now not Sandberg had been honest with him about it. In the firm’s response on Wednesday, Facebook’s overall counsel Colin Stretch came to Sandberg’s defense by claiming that “she had now not known in regards to the work performed by the Definers public household firm related to Mr. Soros.” The letter also characterized Sandberg’s seek info from for workers to stare into the billionaire following his public criticism of the platform as “entirely appropriate.”
As , in January of this year, George Soros gave a highly publicized speech to replace and political leaders by which he known as our firm a “chance to society.” As is to be anticipated following an attack from such a infamous and broadly revered prefer, Facebook workers proper now initiated study to strive to take hang of the motivations riding the criticism, monetary or otherwise. That study was underway when Sheryl Sandberg, Facebook’s Chief Working Officer, sent an email asking if Mr. Soros had shorted Facebook inventory. To be definite, Ms. Sandberg’s seek info from was entirely appropriate given her role as COO.
The response follows a series of experiences that Sandberg may also just beget had extra info in regards to the opposition work than she before all the pieces let on. As acknowledged by the board of their response to Gaspard, it was printed closing week that Sandberg herself requested info on Soros.
In his letter to Facebook’s board on Tuesday, Gaspard acknowledged Facebook’s failure to “take responsibility for the explain material printed in your platform” had “implications for democracy itself.” He known as for an just investigation into Facebook’s opposition advertising campaign in opposition to Soros and acknowledged that Sandberg had now not spoken “in factual faith” when she reportedly knowledgeable Gaspard that she knew nothing about such work by Definers, the opposition study firm that dispensed factually misleading info about Soros to reporters on Facebook’s behalf.
As Gaspard illustrious, there beget been inconsistencies in Sandberg’s beget admission of how unprecedented she knew of Definers’ work for the firm. She before all the pieces denied altogether shining about Definers, most productive to later concede that “[Definers’] work was integrated into presents presented to me and I obtained a puny replacement of emails where Definers was referenced.”
The board’s defense of Sandberg on Wednesday falls fixed with its claim closing week that study into Soros’ monetary pursuits was “already underway” when Sandberg requested info on him. That being acknowledged, and as Gaspard illustrious in his letter, “the memoir from [Facebook] retains changing with every unique headline.”
[Wall Street Journal]